Kimi Agent Swarm

Kimi Agent Swarm (Multi-Agent Workflows)

If you’ve ever tried to use AI for a “big” job like researching 50 competitors, writing 20 pages in the same style, building a full content pipeline, or producing a massive report you’ve probably hit the same wall:

One model can be smart, but it still works like one person.
And one person, no matter how smart, is slow when the job should be done in parallel.

That’s the idea behind an agent swarm: instead of one AI doing everything step-by-step, you get a coordinated team multiple specialized agents working at the same time then merging results into one final output.

Kimi describes this as “Agent Swarm (Beta)” and positions it for large-scale tasks: generating massive reports, researching hundreds of companies, running batch workflows, and producing consistent outputs efficiently.

This article explains it like a human:

• What an agent swarm actually is (without the hype),

• When it helps and when it’s overkill,

• A practical example pipeline you can copy (project planning + content production),

• A quality checklist so outputs don’t become messy,

• And FAQs people actually ask.

---

What is an agent swarm?

An agent swarm is a workflow where a main “orchestrator” (the lead agent) breaks a complex job into multiple sub-tasks and assigns those tasks to specialized sub-agents that run in parallel.

Think of it like this:

• Single-agent mode = one worker doing research → writing → editing → formatting, in order

• Swarm mode = a manager splits the work across a team:

  • Researcher agent collects facts

  • Analyst agent organizes comparisons

  • Writer agent drafts sections

  • Editor agent rewrites for tone

  • QA agent checks for consistency and gaps

Kimi’s K2.5 technical report describes swarm behavior in exactly this spirit: for complex tasks, Kimi can self-direct an agent swarm, dynamically creating sub-agents and running parallel workflows across a large number of tool calls.

What Kimi says the swarm can do

From Kimi’s own materials, the key claims are:

• It can create up to 100 sub-agents for a complex task

• It can run parallel workflows across up to 1,500 tool calls

• It can reduce execution time compared to a single-agent setup (Kimi cites up to 4.5× faster in their report)

You don’t need to memorize those numbers. The takeaway is simpler:

Swarm mode is for speed + scale + division of labor.

Swarm vs Agent Mode vs Thinking Mode

This is where many people get confused, so here’s a clean separation:

• Thinking Mode: one model reasons more carefully (better logic, deeper steps).

• Agent Mode: one agent runs a workflow (plan → do → refine), possibly with tools.

• Agent Swarm: many agents run parts of the workflow in parallel, coordinated by an orchestrator.

Kimi’s model page describes four modes on web/app: Instant, Thinking, Agent, and Agent Swarm (Beta).

What makes a “swarm” different from “just multiple chats”?

You could open five tabs and ask five different prompts. That’s not the same thing.

A real agent swarm has:

1. Shared goal (one mission, one definition of “done”)

2. Role assignment (sub-agents have clear responsibilities)

3. Orchestration (someone merges outputs, resolves conflicts, removes duplication)

4. Quality control (checks for consistency and errors before final output)

Kimi describes swarm execution as “coordinated, multi-agent workflows,” where specialists contribute toward a single objective.

The mental model that makes it click

If Agent Mode feels like:

“AI as a project assistant”

Then Agent Swarm feels like:

“AI as a small agency”

And that’s exactly why it shines on big workloads.

---

When multi-agent workflows help

Swarm workflows are powerful, but not magic. Use them when the shape of the task benefits from parallel work.

Swarm is worth it when

1) The task has many independent parts

Examples:

• “Research 100 companies and summarize each”

• “Write 20 landing pages using the same template”

• “Generate 50 FAQs across 10 topics”

• “Create multiple persona-based versions of the same page”

These are perfect because each item can be handled independently, then merged.

2) You need multiple specialist viewpoints

Examples:

• One agent for SEO structure

• One agent for human tone rewrite

• One agent for technical accuracy

• One agent for UI/UX clarity

This prevents the “one brain tries to do everything” problem.

3) You want speed without sacrificing coverage

A single agent can do the work, but it’s slower and more likely to forget details mid-way.

Swarm mode is designed to reduce time by parallelizing the workload, as described in Kimi’s report.

4) You’re producing a deliverable bundle

Like:

• report + table + checklist + summary

• doc + slides + sheet

• plan + calendar + internal links + FAQs

Kimi positions Agent Swarm for “massive reports” and large-scale office-style work.

---

Swarm is NOT worth it when

1) The task is small or needs one clear answer

Examples:

• “Rewrite this paragraph”

• “Explain this concept”

• “Fix this one bug”

• “Write a short email”

Swarm adds overhead. It’s like calling a whole team to hang a picture frame.

2) The task is tightly coupled and sequential

Examples:

• implementing a single feature where each step depends on the previous step

• deep math proof that must follow a strict line

• debugging a complex error where the next clue depends on the previous test

In these cases, Thinking or Agent mode often works better than Swarm.

3) You don’t have a clear definition of “done”

Swarm needs a strong goal. If your prompt is vague, you’ll get a lot of output and it may not fit together.

---

A simple decision test

Ask yourself:

Can the job be split into 5–50 smaller tasks that can be completed independently?

• If yes → Swarm can be great

• If no → Use Agent or Thinking instead

---

Example: project planning / content pipeline

Let’s build a realistic example you can use for a website like yours:

Scenario

You want to publish a content cluster about:

• Kimi AI Models (K2, K2.5)

• Kimi Agent Mode

• Kimi Agent Swarm

• Kimi Visual Coding

• Kimi Docs/Slides/Sheets and you want:

• Consistent structure

• Internal linking

• FAQs

• Comparison tables

• Strong human tone

That’s a lot and it’s exactly what Swarm workflows are built for.

---

Step 0: Write the “Swarm Brief” 

Before you start, define:

• Goal

• Audience

• Tone

• Required outputs

• Formatting rules

• Internal links

Swarm Brief template (copy/paste):

• Goal: Publish a cluster of 6 pages that rank and convert

• Audience: beginners + power users

• Tone: clear, friendly, not robotic

• Structure: meta title, meta description, H1, hook, H2 sections, FAQs, CTA

• Rules: short paragraphs, avoid repetition, simple English, no filler

• Internal links: list all URLs you want referenced

• Output: provide final HTML-ready text blocks

This brief is the “single source of truth” that keeps the swarm consistent.

---

Step 1: Assign roles to sub-agents (what each one does)

Here’s a practical swarm team:

1. Research Agent

• Extracts key feature claims

• Collects “what it does” statements

• Notes uncertainty or items to verify

2. Outline Agent

• Proposes page structure (H2/H3)

• Ensures coverage matches search intent

3. Writer Agent

• Drafts the full page content per outline

4. Editor Agent

• Rewrites to sound human

• Removes repetition

• Improves flow

5. SEO QA Agent

• Checks: heading hierarchy, keyword placement, internal links, FAQs, CTA

6. Consistency Agent

• Ensures all pages share the same style and terminology

• Fixes conflicting statements

You can run more agents if needed, but this set already covers most real-world pipelines.

Kimi’s own description of Agent Swarm emphasises specialists working in parallel toward a single goal.

---

Step 2: Run the pipeline in batches

A common mistake is generating everything at once, then drowning in text.

Instead, do it in batches:

Batch A: Cluster map

• Pillar page

• Supporting pages

• Linking plan

Batch B: Outlines

• All outlines first

• Ensure no overlap and no missing topics

Batch C: Drafts

• Generate drafts page-by-page

• Keep structure consistent

Batch D: Rewrite & polish

• Human rewrite pass

• Tighten intros

• Remove repeated phrases

Batch E: QA & packaging

• Internal link check

• FAQ uniqueness check

• CTA placement check

This keeps the swarm productive and makes merging easier.

---

Step 3: Example output package

For each page, your swarm output should include:

• Meta title

• Meta description

• H1

• Hook (2–3 lines)

• 4-6 H2 sections with short paragraphs

• One comparison table (if relevant)

• 20-40 FAQs (short answers)

• CTA block (2 buttons)

That’s a publish-ready bundle.

---

Step 4: A real “Swarm prompt” you can use

Here’s a practical prompt that encourages a swarm-style output even if the UI abstracts the sub-agent orchestration:

Swarm prompt (copy/paste):

Build a complete content pack for the page: “Kimi Agent Swarm (Multi-Agent Workflows)”.
Requirements:

• Write like a human, not robotic

• Use short paragraphs and clear headings

• Include a practical example pipeline for content production

• Add an output quality checklist

• Add 30 FAQs with short answers (2–4 sentences)

• End with a CTA block with 2 buttons

• Include internal links: /kimi-ai/ /models/kimi-k2/ /models/kimi-k2-5/ /kimi-agent-mode/
  Also: include a “when NOT to use swarm” section.

This gives the orchestrator a strong target and prevents random fluff.

---

Output quality checklist

Swarm output can be huge which means quality can drift. Use this checklist every time before publishing.

A) Content quality

• The intro explains the concept in plain English

• Each H2 answers a real user intent question

• No long walls of text (short paragraphs)

• No repeated opening lines like “In today’s world…”

• Examples are specific, not generic

B) Consistency across sections

• Terminology is consistent (“Agent Mode” vs “Agent Swarm”)

• The article doesn’t contradict itself

• The “when to use” and “when not to use” sections align with the decision guide

C) Table and facts sanity check

• Any numbers or claims are attributed or clearly marked as “reported”

• Comparison tables match the written explanations

• If a feature is Beta, it’s clearly labeled as Beta (Kimi labels Agent Swarm as Beta)

D) SEO / publishing readiness

• Meta title and description are present and not keyword-stuffed

• H1 appears once

• Headings follow H2 → H3 (no messy jumps)

• Internal links are included naturally

• FAQs are unique (not copy/paste answers)

E) Human tone polish

• Sentences vary in structure

• Filler words are removed

• The writing sounds like advice from a helpful person, not a brochure

If you do only one thing, run a final “human rewrite pass” after the swarm finishes. It’s the simplest way to remove repetitive patterns.

---

FAQs

What is Kimi Agent Swarm in simple terms?

It’s a multi-agent workflow where a lead agent orchestrates many specialist sub-agents working in parallel to complete large tasks faster and with broader coverage. Kimi positions it for massive research and batch work.

Is Agent Swarm the same as Agent Mode?

No. Agent Mode is one agent running a workflow. Agent Swarm is multiple agents working in parallel under coordination. Kimi lists them as separate modes.

Why would I use a swarm instead of one agent?

Because swarms can split work into parallel tasks faster execution, more coverage, and more specialization (research vs writing vs editing). Kimi’s report discusses parallel workflows and speed improvements compared to single-agent setups.

What kinds of tasks are best for Agent Swarm?

Anything large and repeatable:

• Research hundreds of items

• Generate massive reports

• Build a content pipeline

• Produce many page variants consistently

When should I avoid Agent Swarm?

Avoid it for small, single-answer tasks or tightly sequential work where each step depends on the previous step. In those cases, Agent Mode or Thinking Mode is usually better.

How many agents can the swarm create?

Kimi’s K2.5 technical report describes swarms with up to 100 sub-agents for complex tasks (reported).

Does Agent Swarm require me to define sub-agents manually?

Kimi describes swarm creation and orchestration as automatic in their report (no predefined subagents/workflow required).

Is Agent Swarm available everywhere?

Kimi presents Agent Swarm as “Beta” in its product mode list (web/app), and also highlights it in the product navigation. Availability can depend on the product context and plan.

What is a “tool call” and why does it matter?

A tool call is when the AI uses an external function (like searching, downloading, extracting, formatting, etc.). Kimi’s report frames swarm execution in terms of many tool calls coordinated across agents.

Will swarm output always be higher quality?

Not automatically. Swarms can produce more content faster, but you still need:

• Clear instructions,

• A shared style guide,

• And a quality checklist (like the one above).

How do I keep swarm results consistent across many pages?

Use a single master template:

• Required headings

• Writing rules

• CTA format

• FAQ style rules
  Then run a final “consistency pass” agent to unify tone and terminology.

What’s the biggest mistake people make with swarm workflows?

Starting without a clear brief. If the goal is vague, the swarm will generate a lot but it may not merge cleanly.

Can I use Kimi Agent Swarm for SEO content?

Yes swarm workflows are especially good for:

• Producing page clusters

• Generating FAQ sets

• Building comparison tables

• Maintaining consistent templates across pages

Can the swarm help with docs, slides, or sheets?

Kimi’s K2.5 positioning emphasizes office-style deliverables, and its product navigation highlights workflows that create documents, slides, and sheets alongside Agent Swarm.

Who develops Kimi?

Kimi is developed by Moonshot AI.